Dekada 70 Essay

For the Philippines, the seventies was more than just a period of shaggy hair, bell-bottom jeans, platform shoes, and disco music. It represented the rise of the conjugal dictatorship of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos, a U.S.-sponsored regime characterized by military repression and wholesale human rights violations. Conversely, it was also the rich period for the socio governmental awakening and involvement of many Filipinos the humus for the renowned religious-political event, the 1986 EDSA People Power Revolution. 2 Dekada 70 journeys with the central character Amanda Bartolome (Vilma Santos), the reticent wife of an alpha-male husband, and the worrying flummox of a boisterous all-male brood. Thoroughly relegated to domesticity in a world slathitherd in testosterone, Amanda begins to undergo a transformation when her family becomes imbricated in the sociopolitical realities brought about by the Marcos dictatorship.The firmness of Martial Law, the lifting of the writ of habeas cor pus, the curfews and police searches, all these could have easily floated past Amandas head had her sons not found themselves caught in the crossfire between the government and the pro-democracy movements. As one son after another faces the oppressive forces of the dictatorship, Amanda gradually realizes that the personal is political. While chanting slogans for sociopolitical change, she finds her own voice and comes to terms with the fullness of her own person. 3 It is guiding light that in the film, the divine presence is sublimated in the refusal to acquiesce to societal structures that perpetuate injustice. The characters eyes are opened to the dehumanizing impact of such oppressive structures and they hook up with in the prophetic denunciation of what they have identified as not-God.This importantly resonates with the praxical imperative associated with theologies of liberation, which configure God as imbricated in the collective witness of the oppressed. Amanda then, in he r conversion to justice, can be seen as synechdochic of the epiphanous becoming of Filipinos as a true people of the eucharist. 4 Based on an awarded novel of the same title, Dekada 70 essays Amandas personal and political journey is a patient navigation of each year of the seventies. To director Roos credit, the film has a lite focus and steadily gets to its point through engaging but inobtrusive camera work. The politically-charged scenes are strident enough to be visually disturbing, yet tempered enough to work on a more psychological level.5 There are touches of seventies styleFilipino humor that foreign audiences might miss they effectively relieve oneself that this is a real, average Filipino family trying to navigate through the eye of the political storm. The acting is generally impressive, most especially that of lead actress Santos, who gives a luminous, naked as a jaybird performance. Santos essays the transformation of Amanda so effectively that we do see clearly at t he end of the film that there has been a fundamental change in her character. 6If there is something to be faulted about the film, it is Roos failure to keep melodramatic moments in check. The funeral sequence of one of Amandas sons, for instance, becomes an over-extended session of copious tears. The rich study material of Dekada 70 could do away with such in your face paroxysms, which only work to dull the films cutting edge political trajectory. 7 Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that Roo had created a noteworthy, epic-scale Filipino film, and on a Third World budget at that. It also cannot be denied that Roo had not bury the sentence of history on his home country. 8 Neither will Filipino audiences.